- #Monster cable soundstage vs monster cable streamcast Patch#
- #Monster cable soundstage vs monster cable streamcast upgrade#
The former is important because you will need to unplug those bastards occasionally, and I have some Radio Shack cables that I have to disconnect with a wrench and significant amounts of muscle. Where they get the money for this, yet can't pay for their children's college education, is a question I don't think they'd want to answer.)Īs someone who does a fair bit of plugging together home electronics equipment, it's also important to get quality connectors and shielding. (Case in point: It seems these spinners people buy for their cars are bought by the lower class in my town. Other than a status symbol, it is meaningless.Īnd besides, people who sport jewelry or expensive toys tend to be poorer than those who are more modest. The only reason people get Monster Cables is the same reason people get gold-plated pens. So, Monster Cables are not worth it, strictly speaking.
The higher resistance of standard wires can easily be overcome by "turning up the volume". The only benefit your get from monster cables is a perhaps slightly lower resistance.
If there were some variability of resistance based on current, then there would be a degradation of sound. If there were some frequency dependencies, then you would see a degradation of sound. Those two factors is how well the wires connect to the posts, and how well the wires transmit the signal. However, cables do matter - though as you've observed, not as much as the technology used.Īs a physicist, I can tell you there are two important qualities for the wires, both of which won't affect the sound quality. I do research, and know my physics, and know that placing rocks under my transducers won't yield any discernable benefits, nor will custom-soldering on $600 power cables.
#Monster cable soundstage vs monster cable streamcast upgrade#
And later the upgrade to the Monster Cable. When I was using composite, the shimmering was headache inducing, so I quickly switched to S-Video. In the GameCube, however, I noticed far less shimmering due to aliasing in Metroid Prime. The X-Box move was a move from composite to S-Video, while the Game Cube was an upgrade from cheap S-Video to the Monsters (wasn't expecting a picture quality upgrade wanted a longer cable.) The X-Box switch was MUCH more noticeable - as anyone would expect. S-Video has seperate channels that don't require an extensive comb filter. You are correct that a move from composite to S-Video will generally yield more difference than brand of cable. and for digital audio, it dosen't matter what the cable is, if it'll pass the signal, it'll work, (there's no signal loss with digital connecitons)Īll that being said, monster cables sure are purty. it helps to curb noise.Įither way, unless you're looking at a long run of cables, pretty much anything will do well. for both situations, the components being connected seem to appreciate the higher resistance cable. for rca component video, 75 ohm coax terminated in rca plugs works very well, a friend of mine pointed out that for analog audio, this setup works well. as far as component video is concerned, you'll want to make sure the three cables are as similar as possible, and i recommend true coax, with the proper resistance bnc terminated ends (52 ohm i believe). i have used monster cable speaker cables and signal cables, and you'll not notice a large difference using plain lamp cord and regular cables.
#Monster cable soundstage vs monster cable streamcast Patch#
Unless you're looking at a significant length cable run (25 feet or more), i highly doubt you'll notice any difference at all, even between regular patch cords and a "component video" set of cables (which are three patch cords bound together).
0 kommentar(er)
